|
Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...
[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread] Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated
In news.groups, Orc <[email protected]> writes: > Don't be silly; of _course_ you can have both rec.arts.erotica and > rec.arts.erotica.movies. Some people like .misc'ing the main group when > subgroups are formed, and some people don't, but the transport software > doesn't give a fuck whether a group has subgroups or not. And the royal > pain for _this_ administrator is renaming groups whenever someone > inplements one of these 'required' renamings to satisfy the clique that > must have .misc on every name. In this particular case, though, I'm wondering if there may be an even better reason for renaming. rec.arts.erotica is *not* particularly clear; it could well be a group for discussing erotica. rec.arts.erotica.creative would be much clearer on the intended purpose. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) http://www-leland.stanford.edu/~rra/ Follow-Ups:
|