Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...


[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread]

Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated



In article <[email protected]>,
Evan Leibovitch <[email protected]> wrote:

>Also: It is bad Usenet practise to have a name that is both a newsgroup
>and a base for a hierarchy -- this is indeed a royal pain for
>administrators. You cannot have *both* rec.arts.erotica and
>rec.arts.erotica.movies;

  Don't be silly; of _course_ you can have both rec.arts.erotica
and rec.arts.erotica.movies.  Some people like .misc'ing the main
group when subgroups are formed, and some people don't, but the
transport software doesn't give a fuck whether a group has subgroups
or not.  And the royal pain for _this_ administrator is renaming
groups whenever someone inplements one of these 'required' renamings
to satisfy the clique that must have .misc on every name.


                  ____
    david parsons \bi/ [email protected]^H^Hchi.il.us
                   \/


Follow-Ups: References:

Back to Libary | Sorted by Subject | Sorted by Thread