Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...
[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread] Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated
In article <[email protected]>, Evan Leibovitch <[email protected]> wrote: >Also: It is bad Usenet practise to have a name that is both a newsgroup >and a base for a hierarchy -- this is indeed a royal pain for >administrators. You cannot have *both* rec.arts.erotica and >rec.arts.erotica.movies; Don't be silly; of _course_ you can have both rec.arts.erotica and rec.arts.erotica.movies. Some people like .misc'ing the main group when subgroups are formed, and some people don't, but the transport software doesn't give a fuck whether a group has subgroups or not. And the royal pain for _this_ administrator is renaming groups whenever someone inplements one of these 'required' renamings to satisfy the clique that must have .misc on every name. ____ david parsons \bi/ [email protected]^H^Hchi.il.us \/ Follow-Ups:
|