|
Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...
[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread] Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated
James Alexander Chokey <[email protected]> writes: > Sounds like a well-reasoned, very well conceived proposal. >I only have one question regarding the choice of name. Why rec. >arts.movies.erotica, rather than rec.arts.erotica.movies? Not that >I object to the currently-proposed name, but it might make sense >to try and keep erotica together in one rec.* subhierarchy. There are two reasons as I see them: one, we discuss movies and all facets of the ir production... it just so happens the movies are erotic in nature. Second, the rec.arts.erotica group is most for self-genera ted erotica, where we obviously are not making erotic movies, merely commenting on them, so it seemed reasonable to put us on the movie branch and not the erotica branch. > Not that I want to make a major point out of something >that is merely a minor observation, but I can't help but notice >that all of the moderators are men. (Or at least, I'm assuming >that Imperator is a man). I don't know how many women readers >there are on alt.sex.movies, but I'm sure there must be some. Sadly, not really... There was a time when women felt free and comfortable enough to post to a.s.m., but recently I understand the lebvel of "wannafucks" is growing to the point where the women don't feel like running that gauntlet to post. I am sure there are plenty of women lurkers, but not enough of them post. :-( Jeff -- This is a signature. Its purpose is to tell you who I am and how you can get in touch with me. By being here, its duty is accomplished. It tells you that my e-mail address is [email protected]. I maintain a FAQ. It is at my web site: http://w3.gti.net/director/faqindex.html. Go there. Now. References:
|