Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...


[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread]

Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated



In article <[email protected]>, Imperator <[email protected]> wrote:

>Furthermore, there are those sites that just drop the "sex" branches 
>without even bothering to check what's in each newsgroup (can't blame 
>them...bunching erotica groups together tends to make a nice little ghetto
>just beckoning to be dropped from newsfeeds....

....and it is entirely legitimate to drop entire hierarchies from 
newsfeeds.  That's the whole *point* of keeping Usenet namespace 
well-organized.  That's why we have the whole RFD/CFV process.

I don't object to this proposal in the way I do rec.drugs.* or 
rec.music.white-power -- pornography isn't illegal, and I don't find the 
argument that it's harmful to society very convincing.  But I do agree 
that the group ought to be rec.arts.erotica.movies.

But if some city wants to pass a law keeping all the sex shops in one
neighborhood, that's their right.  Likewise, if some internet service 
provider wants to offer a "family friendly" newsfeed, that's her right as 
well -- we should not be deliberately trying to name newsgroups so as to 
sabotage such setups.

It is exceedingly irresponsible to argue one *must* have 
the name "foo.bat.bar" rather than "for.bar.bat," because the latter is 
much more likely to be dropped.  News.groups is supposed to help ISP's 
configure their newsfeeds, not subvert them.

Comp.*, if I am correct, is the best distributed hierarchy in the Big 8.  
Does it follow that we should put every single newsgroup in comp.* 
because "to bunch them together in rec.* or soc.* makes them a nice 
little ghetto just waiting to be dropped from newsfeeds"?

Like I said, I was not planning to vote either way on this proposal.  But 
if you can't offer any better reason for ignoring the rec.arts.erotica.* 
hierarchy, then I may cast a "NO" ballot.

I should also mention that as things stand, there are far too many 
newsgroups in rec.arts.movies.*.  People are confused about where to 
post, even with seemingly obvious names like 
rec.arts.movies.current-films.  The groups are a mess and the addition of 
*any* other movie group is bound to add to that mess.  The way things are 
going, I wouldn't be surprised to see discussions of _Babe_ wind up being 
crossposted to the adult movies group. :)
-- 
Chris Stone * [email protected] * http://www.princeton.edu/~cbstone
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." -Martin Luther King


Follow-Ups: References:

Back to Libary | Sorted by Subject | Sorted by Thread