Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...


[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread]

Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated


  • Subject: Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated
  • From: [email protected] (James Alexander Chokey)
  • Date: 21 Jan 1996 14:55:20 -0800
  • Newsgroups: news.groups
  • Organization: Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
  • References: <[email protected]>

In article <[email protected]>,
Jeff Knapp  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>RATIONALE: rec.arts.movies.erotica
>

	Sounds like a well-reasoned, very well conceived proposal.
I only have one question regarding the choice of name.  Why rec.
arts.movies.erotica, rather than rec.arts.erotica.movies?  Not that
I object to the currently-proposed name, but it might make sense
to try and keep erotica together in one rec.* subhierarchy.  


>Moderator: Imperator <[email protected]>
>Moderator: Brad Williams <[email protected]>
>Moderator: Jeff Knapp <[email protected]>
>Moderator: Peter Van Aarle <[email protected]>
>Moderator: Tim Evanson <[email protected]>

	Not that I want to make a major point out of something
that is merely a minor observation, but I can't help but notice
that all of the moderators are men.  (Or at least, I'm assuming
that Imperator is a man).  I don't know how many women readers
there are on alt.sex.movies, but I'm sure there must be some.
Might it not be a good idea to have at least one female moderator
of the proposed group, if only to reassure women readers/posters
feel that the group isn't just a place for guys?  


        --  Jim C.
 
 
==========================================================================
| James A. Chokey                            [email protected] |
|									 |
|     The infinite, expressed finitely, is the essence of beauty	 |
|									 |
|                                            ---  Schelling              |
==========================================================================




Follow-Ups:

Back to Libary | Sorted by Subject | Sorted by Thread