|
Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...
[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread] Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated
I have one problem with the proposed name: Conceptually, ram.erotica is - from the point of view of the ram.* hierarchy - a genre split. I would suggest to call the group rec.arts.movies.genre.erotica in order to provide the proper place for further genre splits. This suggestion is analogous to last year's creation of ram.local.indian, a geographical/cultural split, where the "local" had been inserted to provide a place for splits of the same nature. (The original proposal didn't have the "local", that came up in the discussion on news.groups.) I'm aware that I'm opening a can of worms here, quite a few of the regulars on ram.* are strictly opposed to genre splits and the very presence of ram.genre would invite further genre splits. I never was a regular reader of alt.sex.movies. For every interesting post there is too much crap one has to wade through, the group is so badly propagated that - at the time when it reaches Scotland - discussions are incomplete and incomprehensible. It also appears to have as its sole subject American hardcore pornos of the last 5 years. Questions about, say, 1970ies sexploiters [e.g. "Are Arlene Soerje and Alena Penz the same person?"] would appear to be quite out of place there. -- Stefan Kahrs Follow-Ups:
|