|
Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...
[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread] Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated
In article <[email protected]>, Stefan Kahrs <[email protected]> wrote: >I have one problem with the proposed name: >Conceptually, ram.erotica is - from the point of view of >the ram.* hierarchy - a genre split. I would suggest >to call the group > rec.arts.movies.genre.erotica >in order to provide the proper place for further genre splits. You'd be right, if the goal of the group was to discuss movies of one specific 'erotic' genre. But it's not. It's designed to discuss erotic elements of all film. Check the charter; in its context, there is no specific genre to speak of. There is already a newsgroup -- alt.sex.movies -- which is far closer to a genre context, in that it deals with movies normally referred to as 'adult' or 'hardcore'. That newsgroup is not intended to be replaced by r.a.m.e in toto. -- Evan Leibovitch, Sound Software Ltd., located in beautiful Brampton, Ontario SCO & Novell Unix Master Reseller / [email protected] / (905) 452-0504 There are two types of people: those who divide people into two types, and those who don't. References:
|