|
Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...
[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread] Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated
Director ([email protected]) wrote: : On 20 Jan 1996 08:13:27 -0500, CA38 wrote: : > If part of a posting is found unsuitable, will the offending parts be : > deleted, or will the entire message be sent back to the author? : If part of a posting is bad, then part of it is good... if part is good, : it should probably be posted... however, there is also percentages to : think about. : If a post is 100 lines of "fuck you" and one line of "I thought deRenzy's : babyFace 1 was much better than its sequel" I think the post would : probably be rejected... : Of course, my other moderators may have their own opinions on this : topic... Stay tuned... Percentages, absolutely. Very rarely, there may be a case where there is a borderline situation (50-50 crap and intelligence) and the poster would be asked to resubmit or to tone down the bad stuff. Often, flames work this way: although there's a lot of ad hominem stuff in the flame, more often than not a.s.m'ers have also been arguing facts and ideas as well. Stuff like "You're a bonehead...BECAUSE although you mentioned X you forgot to mention Y!" These are always judgment calls, but as the RFD says there will be very little interference--the call for moderation in r.a.m.e is due primarily to the abuses we see rampant in a.s.m.; that seems to be the moderators' chief target in r.a.m.e. See ya... Tim #1 -- References:
|