|
Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...
[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread] Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated
On 23 Jan 1996 05:00:00 GMT, Lee S. Bumgarner wrote: > > Newsgroups line: > > rec.arts.movies.erotica Discussion of erotic films and videos. (Moderated) > you would need someplace for unmoderated discussion..is the old group going > to be that? Yes. alt.sex.movies is not going to be harmed in this scenario. We are merely looking to create a low noise, high signal newsgroup to complement, not replace, alt.sex.movies. > I would like to think that _erotic_ would not be used as an excuse for > purierent (sp) discussions that are nothing more than the Usenet equv. of > a "huh huh huh huh I could see her thingie..." I think while there is some of that in a.s.m., that is the sort of thing we are looking to get away from in r.a.m.e. If you look at the best days of a.s.m., you'll notice that those sorts of threads are missing. The a.s.m. library (http://home.eznet.net/~rwilhelm/asm/library) archives posts from our "better" days. Jeff -- This is a signature. Its purpose is to tell you who I am and how you can get in touch with me. By being read, it has done its duty. It will tell you that my e-mail address is [email protected]. I maintain a FAQ. It is at my web site: http://w3.gti.net/director/faqindex.html. Go there. Now. References:
|