|
Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...
[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread] Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated
> Newsgroups line: > rec.arts.movies.erotica Discussion of erotic films and videos. (Moderated) you would need someplace for unmoderated discussion..is the old group going to be that? > Though its charter never explicitly stated so, discussion in a.s.m. > has been almost exclusively centered on hardcore films and videos. > At the same time, the existing rec.arts.movies.* groups generally > (and perhaps justifiably, according to their charters) ignore the > erotic element of mainstream movies. This polarization has left the > many afficionados of softcore, "sexploitation", Playboy-type videos > and even mainstream erotic releases (such as the recent > "Showgirls") feeling equally uneasy in both rec.arts.movies.misc > and alt.sex.movies. Discussion in the proposed group should > hopefully encompass the whole spectrum of erotic movies. I would like to think that _erotic_ would not be used as an excuse for purierent (sp) discussions that are nothing more than the Usenet equv. of a "huh huh huh huh I could see her thingie..." Of course, if soc.sex and sci.sex existed, this would be less of a problem. -l --- ----> Undertoad (under construction) http://falcon.jmu.edu/~bumgarls/ <------ Online Editor, BreezeNet----> http://breeze.jmu.edu/ REALITY.SYS corrupted. Reboot universe (Y/N/Q)? |"You are the Bum* who built this mess all the wrong way!"-DrG | Just say no to M$'s Blackbird |LSB| ##30## Follow-Ups:
|