|
Another fine message from the rec.arts.movies.erotica reading room...
[Prev][Next][Subject][Thread] Re: RFD: rec.arts.movies.erotica moderated
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Director) wrote: >> If part of a posting is found unsuitable, will the offending parts be >> deleted, or will the entire message be sent back to the author? > >If part of a posting is bad, then part of it is good... if part is good, >it should probably be posted... however, there is also percentages to >think about. > >If a post is 100 lines of "fuck you" and one line of "I thought deRenzy's >babyFace 1 was much better than its sequel" I think the post would >probably be rejected... > >Of course, my other moderators may have their own opinions on this >topic... Stay tuned... I would reject that post. Maybe I would ad a note to the guy submitting it telling him that it would be accepted if he took out the 99 lines of "fuck you"... -- My WWW-site is mirrored by Ron: http://www.io.com/~rwilhelm/asm/aarle For those who want to know more about pornographic movies, it is HIGHLY recommended to read the A.S.M. FAQ before bothering the regulars here with questions they've heard a thousand times before... It's at: http://w3.gti.net/director/faqindex.html ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/vi/videosan/asmfaq ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet-by-hierarchy/alt/sex/movies e-mail: [email protected] with subject: GETFTP INDEX Peter van Aarle ([email protected]) References:
|