Hitchhiker #12
Newsgroups: alt.sex.movies
Subject: QUICK REVIEW: Hitchhiker #12
From: [email protected] (Milton Brewster)
Date: 29 Feb 1996 21:23:34 GMT
I just watched HH#12 last night. It was interesting, but I am puzzled.
NOTE: I've probably stirred up more dust over Paisley Hunter/Winter
than the girl is worth, stating that Max Hardcore done her wrong
in Casting Call #12/13. Now along comes HH#12, which
complicates matters. Here are the scenes....
SCENE ONE: Suzi Mercedes; a curvy, large-framed latina with a dark
pussy, who does just about everything with Max. She is expressive,
responsive. Better than average scene with a not-quite cute but very
game young female performer.
SCENE TWO: Paisley, much younger and skinnier than she is now, wearing
a maroon velvet mini and fooling around on a pool table. Paisley
generates chemistry with Max as she fingers herself; American-fists
herself; blows Max; goes thru a gyn exam; takes three or four Anal
positions. Ends in an average facial. This is a good scene.
SCENE THREE: Christina Angel in a swimsuit by Max's pool. Chistina is
fresh, slim, young NatBlonde with flawless white skin and still-natural
full tits. She generates real heat as she blows Max, goes through a
gyn exam, and moves through three or four anal positions. Max provides
good close-ups and a good facial. A fine scene.
NOTE: There was a curious absence of cowboy positions from any of
the three loops here. Nobody cowboys anybody.
HH#12 was taped about a year ago when CC#13 was taped. It bills
Monique DeMoan, but stars Paisley and Christina Angel, just like
CC#13. Paisley is dressed in the same velvet dress that she wore in
CC. Here is where similarity stops and confusion starts.
The scenes in HH#12 were as good as the scenes in CC#13 were bad.
Neither Paisley nor Christina have trouble with their anal positions,
as they did in CC#13. Neither cries out in pain. Neither scene ends
in a pretend cumshot. Both women generate warmth (if not heat)
working with Max. Both scenes are very similar in structure, costumes
and props, to their counterparts in CC#13. It's like HH#12 was a
second take on CC#13.
I could be mistaken on people and performance details; but a few
general things stand out: Paisley did a *good* job with Max in this
scene, and Christina did an even better job. This stands in stark
contrast to the two bad scenes both girls provided in CC#12/13(?), shot
at just about the same time.
Not that any of this matters, but I sure would like to know why HH#12
is so good when CC#13 was so bad, given that the same people produced
the same tapes at just about the same time. .... but then, I never
claimed that I understood the Adult Video business.....
M. Brewster.
Created: September 17, 1996 -- 10:28 PM
Last Updated:
Visitor: