From: [email protected] (Eric Dew) Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.erotica Subject: Car Wash Angels -- Second opinion Date: Thu, 24 Apr 97 17:27:05 A couple of weeks ago, someone posted a review of the movie here on RAME. So I rented it to check it out. Was your copy completely washed out by over-exposure? Either the dupingwas poorly done or the original taping was performed by some idiot who knows nothing of lighting. The whole tape was over-exposed. Many times, one couldn't make out the face because the face bled into the neighboring leg or the white wall behind everyone. Second bad item: the music. It was just horrid. Yeah, they held a beat, and they could technically sing, and no off-key playing, but it was loud, rude, and boring as all. The worse is that the music obscured the "sexual music," that of the moans and groans of the ladies. TT Boy was there fucking every women in sight. I think he popped about twenty times in the video. The camera person (or editor, and certainly the director) can't do lesbo gang-bang scenes. Here's the way to do it: tape the woman who is most excited. Hold the camera steady until she comes. Get all of her body in the frame. The plot is one of the most convoluted Jim Holliday plot. It involves the Burton Allen Institute. All the students are named Mary. So, what were the good parts? Careena Collins in her part of a 6+ all-girl orgy. She squirted under the ministrations of Bionca. Careena Collins with TT Boy (again) and Tom Byron. Is it just me, or is Tom Byron looking creepier and creepier? Crystal Breeze with someone (I can't tell -- there are fifteen blondes who look almost identical. With the white-washing from the overexposure, it was near impossible to see the faces.). Crystal had some nice O's. Welcome back, Crystal. The video was worth it for Careena and Crystal and Bionca. Funny, the three non-blondes. The blondes are pretty, but too many of them makes the viewer jaded. Oh, DON'T EVER do a close up of the rear lights of a car. It is NOT artistic. EDEW